PDA

View Full Version : Out-of-work job applicants told unemployed need not apply



TheQueen
06-17-2010, 01:57 PM
The last thing someone who is unemployed needs to be told is that they shouldn't even apply for the limited number of job openings that are available. But some companies and recruiters are doing just that.

Employment experts say they believe companies are increasingly interested only in applicants who already have a job.

"I think it is more prevalent than it used to be," said Rich Thompson, vice president of learning and performance for Adecco Group North America, the world's largest staffing firm. "I don't have hard numbers, but three out of the last four conversations I've had about openings, this requirement was brought up."

Some job postings include restrictions such as "unemployed candidates will not be considered" or "must be currently employed." Those explicit limitations have occasionally been removed from listings when an employer or recruiter is questioned by the media though.

That's what happened with numerous listings for grocery store managers throughout the Southeast posted by a South Carolina recruiter, Latro Consulting.

After CNNMoney called seeking comments on the listings last week, the restriction against unemployed candidates being considered came down. Latro Consulting refused to comment when contacted.

Sony Ericsson, a global phone manufacturer that was hiring for a new Georgia facility, also removed a similar restriction after local reporters wrote about it. According to reports, a Sony Ericsson spokesperson said that a mistake had been made.

But even if companies don't spell out in a job listing that they won't consider someone who currently doesn't have a job, experts said that unemployed applicants are typically ruled out right off the bat.

"Most executive recruiters won't look at a candidate unless they have a job, even if they don't like to admit to it," said Lisa Chenofsky Singer, a human resources consultant from Millburn, NJ, specializing in media and publishing jobs.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Outofwork-job-applicants-told-cnnm-3498252371.html?x=0

figmentmom
06-19-2010, 02:27 PM
It's a vicious circle for the unemployed, isn't it? :no

pinkrose
06-19-2010, 10:52 PM
That just doesn't even make sense. :no

figmentmom
06-20-2010, 11:55 AM
That just doesn't even make sense. :no

No, it doesn't, but there is very much an attitude in the work marektplace now that says, "If no one else wants to hire you, why should I?" It's lousy, but it's there.

Tom
06-20-2010, 12:50 PM
It really depends on how long you have been unemployed. I don't recommend lying on a resume, but you can "pad" your dates a little bit (IE: If you got laid off say June 1st, you can put on your resume, June 2010) Or if you have a severance package and it will last 6 weeks, you can "technically" pad your resume to "July 2010."

The longest I've been laid off is 4 months. Yes, I have had interviewers ask me, "So why are you here?" or "How long have you been laid off?" But it did not seem to be a real issue.

However, if you go a year or more, then yes, I would expect companies to have the attitude of "If no one else wants to hire you, why should we?" You can sidestep that issue in several ways, "I haven't been seriously looking until the economy improves." Or, "My wife and I decided that it would be best for me to take care of the kids until the economy improved."

Christy
06-20-2010, 12:52 PM
From time to time the issue came up to Dave Ramsey that people who'd been laid off were not hired because they'd worked whatever they could to put food on the table for their families (think pizza delivery, etc) and his attitude was always "Well, that would make me want to hire you in a heartbeat, that you were willing to work to provide for your family, but some people are stupid" :lol

Tom
06-20-2010, 01:00 PM
From time to time the issue came up to Dave Ramsey that people who'd been laid off were not hired because they'd worked whatever they could to put food on the table for their families (think pizza delivery, etc) and his attitude was always "Well, that would make me want to hire you in a heartbeat, that you were willing to work to provide for your family, but some people are stupid" :lol

Exactly. I have one job on my resume that is not inline with my profession. When interviewers ask about it, I explain that I had gotten laid off, and I had to take something to pay the bills (I was single at the time). Since all my other positions are in my field, it doesn't seem to be a big deal.